Navigation
Harpoon: Reykjavik Whale Watching Massacre (2009)

Dir: Júlíus Kemp
A multi-cultural bunch of tourists in Iceland
take a whale watching trip out to sea on a fishing boat of Captain
Pétur (Gunnar Hansen) and his sleazy deck hand.
But obnoxious, drunken,
Frenchman (Im saying nothing!) Jean Francois (Aymen Hamdouchi) causes an
accident that sees Captain Pétur seriously injured.
Help seemingly arrives in the form a scruffy looking man (Helgi Björnsson) who takes the group onto his small boat but announces a storm is coming so theyll have to wait it out on his familys large fishing vessel.
Unfortunately
for the tourists his family are a bunch of tourist/environmentalist murdering
bunch of psychos who, after the ban on whaling, have turned to robbery and butchery.
And
sure enough soon after meeting the mans mother (Gudrun Gisladottir) and
perverted brother (Stefan Jonsson) the group are fighting for their lives
Iceland,
along with Japan and Norway, was a heavy whaling nation before international law
banned commercial whaling.
What was a right-thinking action did have an effect
on local economies though.
This is where the whale watching tours
come in, which means a crew that made a living from hunting whales can now try
to make a living taking tourists out to watch the whales instead.
But in Icelands
first full on exploitation movie the makers invent a scenario where some ex-whalers
have taken to murdering tourists instead of taking them on sight-seeing trips.
This
loss of income and lifestyle is a nicely Icelandic take on the automated
butchery change that put the family out of business in The Texas
Chainsaw Massacre of course
something obviously intentional by
writer Sjón Sigurdsson, a noted novelist and lyricist who works regularly
with barmy Björk.
And for the most part
this local take on that idea works very well and offers up a generally well paced,
well made, successful (if highly eccentric) take on the family of killers
set-up.
Thats not to say the screenplay does not have some faults, in
the first part of the film, with excess baggage and flab.
The opening sequence
is too long for example and gets the film off to a weak start and why we need
to see, no less than four times, one of the girls (whos late for the trip)
running for the boat, especially when she makes it anyway so nothing plot wise
has been gained, is anyones business. Running along a road is hardly characterisation
is it? Its an example of blubber that needed cutting.
And when added
to the large group of, pretty much all unlikeable at the moment, characters that
spend most of the opening arguing, puking and being stupid, the first 15 minutes
of the film do not herald much hope for the audience, away from a nicely messy
(though off-frame) axe death.
Thankfully though, once
the utterly wasted and dubbed over Gunnar Hansen is injured (in one of the worst
above the title name dropping cameos out!), the film starts to come to life and
at last the screenplay is concerning itself on specifics and becoming focused.
And
now the uncertain pace and feel of the movie also improves as barely a minute
has passed ,after the group has climbed aboard the charnel boat, before the nicely
nasty gore and violence is unleashed.
And, although pretty
sparse, this violence and gore is well done and delivers the goods.
People
are despatched by knife, hammer, axe, shotgun and even (in a silly but great scene,
thats unique as far as I know, a welcome thing itself in a horror movie)
a ship deck harpoon gun!
Certainly heads more than roll in this sucker.
We
also have some nicely gratuitous breast exposure to add to the pile of grimy exploitation
goodies on offer.
So as a backwaves
psycho family flick the film works well and delivers all it should even
if there is nothing groundbreaking or surprising here and even if the killers
are rather generic.
But there is more here thanks to the unusual screenplay
by Sigurdsson that offers up some sudden surprises as far as characters go and
how the set-up plays out.
As far as characters go the most bizarre is Endo
(Nae), who is the maid to a Japanese couple in the group, who for the first half
of the film blends blandly into the background before she explodes front and centre
as her truly vicious and mercenary personality is revealed. Shes a major
highlight.
Theres also a very nice and unusual about-turn concerning
the two main young girls in the group as audience perceptions are turned on their
head.

The humour
and seriousness is not mixed well though. Or is it? Im not sure.
Damn
the wonderful strangeness of this film!
Not that whats serious is not
effective or whats funny (in a mild, black, inappropriate way) isnt
amusing. Its just that the humour seems misplaced and jarring in the context
it appears.
A revelation concerning the black guy Leon (Terence Anderson)
for example is a damn funny, unexpected, moment but the timing of it seems inappropriate
to the seriousness of the film at this point.
And yet the last part of the
movie becomes so damn off-the wall and so full of unexpected events (that move
the film away from its basic set-up) that perhaps this humour during the main
bulk of the film is meant to be a stepping stone for the audience to ease them
into the craziness to come.
The choice to split
the action up into various locales at about the 60 minute mark, that heralds this
crazy turn in the film, is a double edged sword also.
It makes for a nice twist
on the cliché Texas Chainsaw Massacre style set-up but
it fragments the narrative at a crucial point, where by rights the build-up should
be getting more intensely structured hurtling the audience along, and instead
it slows the film down and give the last 15 minutes or so of the running time
a lot of new plot to cover.
But thankfully what it also does is to cleverly
(actually quite bravely) open up the opportunity for the film to now deliver some
unexpected (ironic, wicked and often bizarre) events that are pretty much its
own and offer up new takes on the compact, by now playing out as you would expect,
stalk n slash structure that the film was up to this moment
following.

As such
the final 20 minutes of the film, a film that has indeed been (as its lure the
punters edit, of a Billy Chainsaw, publicity quote on the DVD hammers
home) toying with doing The Texas Chainsaw Massacre at sea,
suddenly becomes a delightfully eccentric work full of unexpected twists (bar
one clumsily obvious outcome involving guns) and weird events and (at last) truly
forges its own identity.
Leon does commit a couple of bad, cliché Slasher
movie (although this is not really a Slasher movie), faux pas in what he decides
to do and not do during this part of the film
but really this is when Reykjavik
Whale Watching Massacre becomes a very unusual, even unique, work that defies
the audiences expectations.
Overall then this is
a pretty standard, but well made and satisfying, take on an exploitation, psycho
family, horror film that we have all seen countless times before.
And if the
start of the film is flabby and weak the use of the sea and the Icelandic cultural
takes in the set-up add something different and when the film kicks the killing
off we have a good, if unexceptional, horror film.
But when the screenplay
becomes brave enough to do its own thing this well above average horror film becomes
something extra special and unexpected (almost as unexpected as the Thanks
to Barack Obama credit at the end in fact!) and as such gets a whale-sized,
hearty, recommendation.